Friday, May 4, 2007

The Supplement Wars: How HMB stacks up against pro-hormones and anabolic steroids

There's still quite a bit of confusion, as to how HMB really works and its correct long-term perception. Most of the content that's been drafted here referred to HMB and its uses in a somewhat isolated format. But a better understanding may be conveyed if HMB's comparative nature to high-end pro-hormones and anabolic steroids was illustrated here. Pro-hormones and anabolic steroids act directly on the anabolic pathways primarily affecting the process of hypertrophy (by instructing hypertrophy and cortisol suppression to occur beyond normal genetic means), while HMB acts directly on the anti-catabolic pathway reducing the process of proteolysis or protein breakdown (by suppressing it through cell membrane reconstruction and layer reinforcement). HMB works primarily on a reverse pathway to the same objective (muscle growth or hypertrophy), as hormonal anabolics. Not surprisingly, HMB's positive affects on cardiac function (i.e., lower LDL cholesterol) are the reverse of the adverse effects users of anabolic steroids normally experience on the cardiac system long-term. The vast majority of pro-hormones don't have the potency of real anabolic steroids, and according to anecdotal evidence from users, many of these products may arguably place consumers at greater risk of product-specific side effects, depending on ingredient configuration and prolonged dosing patterns. The reason for this contention is that many pro-hormone products are improperly modified androgens, whose anabolic effects were marketed on the basis of establishing correlation between increases in androgenic substance production and molecular modification of highly controlled variables (i.e., molecular repositioning of targeted hydro-carbons) in isolation, outside the context of the human body. Anabolic steroids always have documented effects on human and/or other intended animal subjects before its potential medicinal uses are assessed, reviewed, and defined (according to FDA regulation).

Although, a comparison between HMB and hormonal anabolics is drawn here, pro-hormones and anabolic steroids need to have certain differences clarified for consumer understanding. HMB in terms of its growth contingent is slow, and will most likely not produce visible results within the time normally seen with fast-acting substances like creatine and high-end hormonal anabolics. In an industry, whose customer base leans toward instant gratification, HMB will not sound attractive, due to its metabolic constraints: It works through reduction of the body's catabolic effects on muscle, allowing the anabolic process to become more effective, but at the same metabolic rate producing faster and more efficient recovery. The real question is this: Does the average consumer have the patience to allow HMB to slowly produce results, in full accordance with the body's natural growth mechanisms, even if the fringe benefits were that there are virtually no known side effects from its use and the gains although modest, are seemingly near-permanent? People who do not take into regard the risk of using hormonal anabolic substances will most likely not consider the level of required patience that important a factor (again, immediate benefits and delayed costs). Those who look to evaluate products' long-term benefit(s) within their proper margin(s) of safety will find HMB an attractive option, for further consideration. In terms of immediate results in visible cell volumization, hypertrophy scale, and fast hardening and density, the high-end anabolics win the battle. In terms of long-term gains (near-permanent) from slowly accrued muscle and strength, reduced cardiac risk with long-term fat loss, and extended hardening effects/density enhancement, HMB wins the war.

One of the key points this post makes is that trade-offs exist in many product selection challenges. Therefore, when comparing products, their costs and benefits, and advantages and disadvantages should also be made in comparative fashion. Users want to assess the differences between one product's effects on the body versus another product's effect on the body. In sum, HMB stacks up rather well for a natural downstream metabolite that's molecularly two steps down from the amino acid Leucine.


Recommended Product(s):

HMB

No comments: